Corrected Issues in Aviatrix Release 10.1.11
| Issue | Description |
|---|---|
| AVX-82309 | Fixed an issue where a gateway could continue enforcing a Distributed Cloud Firewall (DCF) SmartGroup’s previous member list after a new address, such as a new Kubernetes pod IP, joined the SmartGroup, which could allow or deny traffic in a way that did not match the configured policy intent until state sync restarted. |
Known Issues in Aviatrix Release 10.1.11
| Issue | Description |
|---|---|
| AVX-80977 | A VPN user’s profile assignment could appear as N/A immediately after the user was attached to a profile through the API, until the user’s next reconnection. Impact:
Have the affected user reconnect to update the displayed profile assignment. Contact Aviatrix Support for assistance. |
| AVX-81230 | Enabling both Policy-Based Routing (PBR) and NAT logging under User VPN settings can cause high CPU utilization on the User VPN gateway during data-plane traffic. The high CPU usage occurs because NAT log entries generated by PBR are written to the gateway’s serial console. Impact: User VPN gateways with both PBR and NAT logging enabled may experience elevated CPU utilization while passing data-plane traffic, which can degrade VPN gateway performance. Workaround: Disable NAT logging on the affected User VPN gateway. If NAT logging must remain enabled, contact Aviatrix Support to apply a backend workaround. |
| AVX-81576 | Description: During a Gateway resize operation (for example, changing the Gateway’s underlying instance or VM size), the Gateway can experience a temporary period of traffic loss during the resize. This has been observed during testing on GCP, AWS, and Azure Gateways, where a resize between certain instance sizes produced approximately 2 minutes of packet loss. Impact:
No workaround is currently available. A fix is planned for a future 10.1.x maintenance release. |
| AVX-81949 | After a gateway software rollback, a small subset of HA gateways may incorrectly display the previous software version as the same value as the current software version, instead of the pre-rollback version. Impact:
No functional workaround is required. The rollback operation is successful despite the display discrepancy. Contact Aviatrix Support for assistance. |